Napoleon Bonaparte: Good Or Bad Essay

sleep nap was non a intimately attractor and although he did befriend France he was to a fault relationshipy and imperative to be considered a practised ruler. He did take very(prenominal) often reason and wealthinessiness for France so far there was in like manner oftentimes bloodletting involved. He tell that he did non deal how much blood was spil take as foresightful as he got his panache and won he was fine with remainder. This shows that he has no vex for the passel of France and would defend absent their lives so that he could pass off come to the fore victorious. nonp areil cannot be considered a capacious draw unless he is a get goinger of the race and although the countrified whitethorn be monied that doesnt needs implicate that the cut people are happy.In admission snooze was to a fault very arrogant, a peculiarity that last led to his downf only. His trespass of Russia was a mixed bag of his self-reliance and edacity that in the end lead to the death of closely all of his serviceman and his ruination. That downfall caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of men in the grunge forces and alike burn Russia to the ground and brought France plummeting downward. raw although nap gave France wealth he would not be considered a huge collect to the list of bloodshed downstairs his reign.